ABSTRACT
Influenza represents a major burden for public health. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are a priority target group for flu vaccination. During the COVID-19 pandemic, when SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were not yet available, susceptibility to influenza vaccination especially by HCWs increased. The aim of this study is to analyze the flu vaccination coverage among HCWs and to study which factors affected their adherence given the concomitant COVID-19 vaccination. The retrospective study was conducted in an Italian research hospital from October 2021 to January 2022. A total of 7,048 individuals was included. Age class, gender and job category variables were analyzed. Statistically significant differences among groups were tested through χ2 test. Univariate and multivariate analyses (p < 0,005) were performed to assess differences towards vaccination attitude. The flu vaccination coverage rate was 24.6%. Among the selected job categories, 29.8% of physicians, 19.9% of nurses and 19.7% of other HCWs were vaccinated with a statistically significant decrease (p < 0.001) across all categories respect with the last campaign. The findings of the logistic regression depicted that the 40-59 years old age class, compared with the youngest age class (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12-1.43) as well as being physician (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.87-3.41) with the respect to being nurses, had a higher adherence to vaccination. Interestingly, being male, is associated with a statistically significant reduction (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.87) in vaccination uptake. Study findings showed a several decline in the flu vaccination coverage comparing with previous campaigns, probably due to the concomitant administration of the booster dose against SARS-CoV-2. This alarm should not be underestimated and requires timely and innovative organizational approaches (i.e., combined vaccine). Further studies are needed to analyze the reasons for this poor adhesion and the strategies to be adopted to increase the awareness of the HCWs. Key messages • Reaching high coverage rates and restore a positive trend for the future campaign for flu vaccination it is essential strategy to protect HCWs themselves, their patients and the hospital community. • Decision-makers should implement consistent communication strategies to lessen vaccine hesitancy among HCWs.
ABSTRACT
Influencing behavioral patterns through primary prevention, possibly addressing more risk factors at a time, is the most effective means to tackle cardiovascular diseases. Many interdisciplinary prevention activities have been coordinated by community nurses outside of specialist centers, resulting in a more effective control of risk factors. Our study aims at describing the impact of an 18-month prevention and promotion, interdisciplinary intervention on lifestyle habits and cardiovascular risk. From December 2018 to May 2020, patients were recruited by 4 General Practitioners (GPs) in the Roman neighborhood of Torresina and received nutritional, physical and psychological counselling to learn healthy lifestyles. Until May 2020 patients had to self-manage their new healthy habits, but during this phase the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic broke out. Patients were assessed at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months by a nutritionist, a physiotherapist, a psychologist, the 4 GPs and community nurses, and the cardiovascular risk score (CRS) was estimated at every examination. 76 patients were included, with a mean age of 54,6 years. Mean CRS showed a significant reduction between baseline and 12 months (from 4.9 to 3.8, p < 0.001), but this trend was not maintained at 18 months. As for variables included in the calculation of the cardiovascular risk score, both total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure significantly decreased at 6 months of follow up (respectively, from 211.1 to 192 (p < 0.001) and from 133.1 to 123.1(p < 0.001)). Nontheless, the reduction was maintained in the remaining points in time only for systolic blood pressure. Our interdisciplinary educational intervention in a primary care setting resulted in a CRS improvement at 12 months, but this changes where not maintained at 18 months. Community nurses were facilitators in improving health outcomes and patient's satisfaction in the described primary care setting. Key messages Our interdisciplinary educational intervention in a primary care setting resulted in a CRS improvement at 12 months, but this changes where not maintained at 18 months. Community nurses are facilitators in improving health outcomes and patient’s satisfaction in the described primary care setting.
ABSTRACT
Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) involve high costs both in health and economic terms for patients and health systems. Implementing Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) programs is critical to decrease infectious agents' transmission in healthcare settings. The aim of this study is to assess if the monitoring of Contact Precautions could decrease the incidence of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MRDOs) infections. This pilot study was conducted in a teaching hospital in Rome. A checklist of 16 items was developed to assess the compliance to Contact Precautions in 11 hospital wards in which MRDOs were detected between November and December 2020. It was administered on-site both interviewing healthcare professionals and through direct observation. A paired t-test with α = 5% was used to compare the number of alert organisms in the first quarter of 2020 respect to the first quarter of 2021 before and after implementing the surveillance checklist. A total of 30 checklists were analyzed. The rate of compliance to Contact Precautions was high for the proper use of personal protective equipment (100%), the intensified room cleaning (100%) and the presence of isolation mark (100%), while it was low for the active screening of contacts (53%). Mean MDROs infections rate decreased from 4.94 to 4.37 for every 1000 hospitalization day, with an average decrease of 0.57. However, the paired t-test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the mean number of MDROs infections before and after the implementation of the checklist (p > 0.05). Despite the good adherence to IPC program, the low infection rate decrease, is probably due to the impact of COVID-19 on the HAIs surveillance and prevention practices. Even if the check-list administration could be a useful tool to reduce MDROs infections, it should be associated to other prevention strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to achieve a successful outcome. Key messages Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections represents a priority public health challenge in order to improve patient safety and health system economic sustainability. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that healthcare facilities should enhance efforts in their IPC programs to reduce Healthcare-Associated Infections.